Exactly. This battle is being played out through language. It is how a country is captured in a coup when new names are created and the flag is changed. In this internal domestic coup it was our rainbow flag that was changed and new language inserted to introduce the concept of a "gender identity" and thus a "transgender" person. A concept that unhinges us from biological reality. This negation denies the reality of the differences of the sexes as defined by human reproduction and that is a violation of our social contract.
Your last paragraph reminded me of my time in the Palo Alto Fire Dept. 35 years ago when I stood up in front of the PA City Council to tell them that we needed separate bathroom/locker room facilities for privacy. Everyone made it a "woman's issue" instead of an issue of privacy. There I stood, at 11:30pm, stating my case that to avoid harassment by the men we needed separate facilities. It would take five years, and very bad architectural planning, to get the changes in their six stations, but they did come. However, the men used the women's bathrooms when no women were stationed there.
This is excellent.
It's just the language.
You said these are male players on women's teams because they are.
They're not "transgender" because there is no such thing. It doesn't exist.
Exactly. This battle is being played out through language. It is how a country is captured in a coup when new names are created and the flag is changed. In this internal domestic coup it was our rainbow flag that was changed and new language inserted to introduce the concept of a "gender identity" and thus a "transgender" person. A concept that unhinges us from biological reality. This negation denies the reality of the differences of the sexes as defined by human reproduction and that is a violation of our social contract.
More and more people see it every day.
I see it more and more in news stories—fewer people are saying “trans” woman because they realize what a load of nonsense the whole thing is.
All we have to do is refuse to say the words. Everyone who is going along with this will pretend like they never supported it in the first place.
Bruce Jenner is a man. Ellen Page is a woman. End of story.
Your last paragraph reminded me of my time in the Palo Alto Fire Dept. 35 years ago when I stood up in front of the PA City Council to tell them that we needed separate bathroom/locker room facilities for privacy. Everyone made it a "woman's issue" instead of an issue of privacy. There I stood, at 11:30pm, stating my case that to avoid harassment by the men we needed separate facilities. It would take five years, and very bad architectural planning, to get the changes in their six stations, but they did come. However, the men used the women's bathrooms when no women were stationed there.